Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Is Rothmire's Salisbury slur the real deal?

  • Comment
letters

I would like to respond to the challenge laid down in the highly personalised letter from David Rothmire for architects who voted for Ian Salisbury to write in to your publication (AJ 24.2.05).

I'm not sure what interest 'Mr Rothmire' represents but, having checked the register, his absence from it indicates that he is unable to vote. There's no record of any person of that name on www.192. com, even though it returned my address, directorship and contact details that I entered to check its accuracy.

Have we found the 'unnamed source' at the ARB? Or is this another example of unelected non-architects attempting to exert undue and unrepresentative influence over the profession?

It would be useful for 'Mr Rothmire' to state what error has resulted in his omission from the register, if only to avoid any allegation that he is a 'plant' or the alter-ego of some unnamed individual with an interest. Such postings are undignified and it can only harm the standing of our profession when gutter tactics are employed.

Readers need to ask themselves who could possibly wish to anonymously rubbish Salisbury and if this is at all necessary considering his resignation was a 'notable non-event'.

Mark Benzie, C3 Design

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.