By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

INSTITUTE DISOWNS COURT CASE 'TECHNOLOGIST'

LETTERS

We wish to make it clear that the Stephen McQuiston featured in the article 'Planning Forgery Case in Court' (AJ 03.11.05) is not a member of the Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists.

According to our records, he has never been a member of our institute, nor has he expressed an interest in joining.

It is important that the institute makes clear that the descriptor 'architectural technologist' is not a protected title and anyone may hold themselves out to be an architectural technologist. However, since our successful petition and grant of charter in July this year, we do have control of the descriptor 'chartered architectural technologist'.

We do have a conduct and disciplinary procedure and if McQuiston had been a member of the institute we may have considered this case and taken any necessary actions.

Francesca Berriman, chief executive, Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters