Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

INSTITUTE DISOWNS COURT CASE 'TECHNOLOGIST'

  • Comment
LETTERS

We wish to make it clear that the Stephen McQuiston featured in the article 'Planning Forgery Case in Court' (AJ 03.11.05) is not a member of the Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists.

According to our records, he has never been a member of our institute, nor has he expressed an interest in joining.

It is important that the institute makes clear that the descriptor 'architectural technologist' is not a protected title and anyone may hold themselves out to be an architectural technologist. However, since our successful petition and grant of charter in July this year, we do have control of the descriptor 'chartered architectural technologist'.

We do have a conduct and disciplinary procedure and if McQuiston had been a member of the institute we may have considered this case and taken any necessary actions.

Francesca Berriman, chief executive, Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.