Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Height fears flatten Farrell's Lots Road project

  • Comment

Terry Farrell's troubled scheme to redevelop Lots Road Power Station has suffered another blow with a fresh refusal from planners.

Developer Circadian is considering appealing after Kensington and Chelsea's planning committee last week rejected the £350 million residential scheme against the advice of its own officers.

The project straddles two different planning authorities and features two towers of 25 and 39 storeys.

It failed to convince planners in both Kensington and Chelsea and neighbouring Hammersmith and Fulham first time around but, after a substantial redesign, has now won backing from Hammersmith.

However, Kensington and Chelsea remains concerned at the height of the towers and the impact they will have on the River Thames.

Councillor Tim Ahern said that unless both towers were reduced to the height of the power station building, rather than the chimneys, it would be unacceptable to his committee. He also remained concerned about traffic increases, he said.

Andrew Locke, project director for Circadian, said: 'We are obviously very disappointed by this decision, especially in light of Hammersmith and Fulham's decision earlier this year to approve the part of the scheme in that part of the borough, subject to agreeing a Section 106 agreement. Circadian will now be carefully considering a number of options including an appeal.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.