By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Good life?

astragal at the urban summit

Lifestyle considerations for the Harlow proposal were given a good airing by Samantha Heath from London's Sustainable Development Commission. Would it feel different to older models of development, and how? Would advantage be taken of proximity to farms and food production?

Would the proportion of people working locally rather than commuting to London be significant? Would water recovery, recycling and other technologies be taken seriously? All this could happen in theory, it transpired.

The question was whether it could be guaranteed as part of the planning process. It was left to Peter Redfern, boss of Wimpey Homes, to remind everyone that market forces cannot be ignored.

As someone remarked, it may be that people in 'north Harlow' might prefer to get in their notso-environmental cars and drive to Bluewater to do their shopping, rather than go to a local farmers' market or shopping centre.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters