Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Good life?

  • Comment
astragal at the urban summit

Lifestyle considerations for the Harlow proposal were given a good airing by Samantha Heath from London's Sustainable Development Commission. Would it feel different to older models of development, and how? Would advantage be taken of proximity to farms and food production?

Would the proportion of people working locally rather than commuting to London be significant? Would water recovery, recycling and other technologies be taken seriously? All this could happen in theory, it transpired.

The question was whether it could be guaranteed as part of the planning process. It was left to Peter Redfern, boss of Wimpey Homes, to remind everyone that market forces cannot be ignored.

As someone remarked, it may be that people in 'north Harlow' might prefer to get in their notso-environmental cars and drive to Bluewater to do their shopping, rather than go to a local farmers' market or shopping centre.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.