By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Gallery feud


Manhattan is experiencing a fall-out, not to say falling-out, following the death of Philip Johnson.

Debate has continued about Johnson's political past, with some condemning it but others praising his virtues as a key figure in 20thcentury architecture. One article has presumed to say what Johnson would have thought of Yoshio Taniguchi's extension of the Museum of Modern Art, with which Johnson was most associated in the city; the shock waves are reverberating. Written by Nicolai Ouroussoff in the New York Times, the piece claims it is hard to imagine that Johnson would have been impressed by the outcome.

Actually it is really an attack on MoMA architecture curator Terry Riley and his current installation.

The critic compares it to a product show in a furniture store; the words 'inertia' and 'torpor' are deployed.

Riley is not amused.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters