Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Ferguson's eyesore war is an intervention too far

  • Comment
letters

The proposal to identify and destroy buildings because they are perceived by some to be vile is disturbing (AJ 26.8.04). If a building has reached the end of its useful life and no appropriate reworking of the building is possible, then, so be it, take it down and develop it with a use more appropriate to the needs of today. Any archaeological dig in any city will reveal layers of previous buildings that have either made way for others or have been adapted as the city grew and flexed in response to change.

Growth and change are driven naturally by opportunity for benefit and society's acceptance of change, not by the form of intervention that RIBA president George Ferguson proposes.

The good and the not so good, the beautiful and the ugly, exist side by side and should continue to do so in a tolerant society.

Kevin Steer, chairman, Stride Treglown

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.