Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

FEARS UNFOUNDED FOR SCOTLAND'S DESIGN REVIEW

  • Comment
LETTERS

Architecture and Design Scotland's (A&DS) consideration about the confidentiality of pre-application discussions under Freedom of Information rules is not threatening its future (AJ 23.06.05).

A&DS has a wider remit than design review and will develop its enabling, advocacy, research and communication roles shortly.

A&DS' aim is to see good-quality outcomes, and we will not shrink from offering robust comment and advice. We welcome feedback on our work, and we will continue to encourage early confidential discussions to enable free and frank exchanges.

One significant difference between A&DS and its predecessor body is enshrined in SPP 20, which states: 'The development industry, as well as decision makers on planning applications and appeals, must demonstrate what account has been taken of the views of A&DS.' This may have made the sector more alert, and improved the quality of public debate.

Sebastian Tombs, chief executive, Architecture and Design Scotland

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.