By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Expensive and excessive - the Autodesk way


I have just read Joe Croser's article about Autodesk's enforced retirement policy (AJ 22.1.04) and agree strongly with his comments. I am an architectural technologist working in local government, and in the last eight years I have had to cope with two major upgrades - R13AEC to R14AEC, and R14AEC to ADT.

I have complained bitterly to AutoDesk as I was just getting to understand all the complexities of AEC when I was told to upgrade to ADT, as AEC would soon become a dead product.

The amount of expense and disruption in new software and retraining is wholly excessive, and when you are under pressure to produce drawings for clients, it's a nightmare.

R14AEC would have lasted me a lifetime. You never had upgrades when drawing boards were used. If I ever went selfemployed I would go for a simple CAD package that did not need frequent upgrades and accept the fact that I would not be able to exchange drawings with other CAD users.

Robert Aspey, via email

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters