Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Expensive and excessive - the Autodesk way

  • Comment
Letters

I have just read Joe Croser's article about Autodesk's enforced retirement policy (AJ 22.1.04) and agree strongly with his comments. I am an architectural technologist working in local government, and in the last eight years I have had to cope with two major upgrades - R13AEC to R14AEC, and R14AEC to ADT.

I have complained bitterly to AutoDesk as I was just getting to understand all the complexities of AEC when I was told to upgrade to ADT, as AEC would soon become a dead product.

The amount of expense and disruption in new software and retraining is wholly excessive, and when you are under pressure to produce drawings for clients, it's a nightmare.

R14AEC would have lasted me a lifetime. You never had upgrades when drawing boards were used. If I ever went selfemployed I would go for a simple CAD package that did not need frequent upgrades and accept the fact that I would not be able to exchange drawings with other CAD users.

Robert Aspey, via email

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.