By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




I was alarmed to read in last week's issue that another Paul Rudolph property has bitten the dust and that his Riverview High School is facing a similarly bleak future ('Rudolph legacy under threat', AJ 18.01.07). You may not be aware that his masterpiece, the Art & Architecture (A&A) building at Yale University, is also under threat, though of a subtler kind.

Ostensibly its fortunes are on the up - a full restoration by Gwathmey Siegel is promised, possibly beginning towards the end of next year. This can only be a good thing, right? But part of the deal is that Gwathmey Siegel builds a new History of Art block next door and, from what one can see on the practice's website ( www. gwathmey-siegel. com), the design is only going to compromise the A&A.

The visuals of the new block show it to be too tall, obstructing the view from Rudolph's penthouse, and far too restlessly modelled, when the expressiveness of the Art & Architecture building should be offset by something much more reticent. One could go on. . .

Ironic, isn't it, that even Yale can't get this right?

Don Livingston, Kettering

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters