By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Don't make me think

I've been told to lighten up about architectural websites so I thought I'd set out my stall about some basic criteria for website criticism.

There are several non-negotiables: text must be user-adjustable, and it must be readable: ie not fashionable light grey on darker grey. There should be no more text than is absolutely necessary because people don't read web pages, they scan. There should be no waiting time for images to load because people's Web attention span gets shorter by the year: they (and you) expect the Web to be fast and efficient.

And you shouldn't have to work out how to use a site. As Steve Krug says in that wonderful web designer's bible, Don't Make Me Think , ' far as it is humanly possible, when I look at a Web page it should be self-evident. Obvious. Self-explanatory.'

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related images

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters