Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Discussion with users is vital for good design

  • Comment
letters

Large hospitals are complex organisations that cannot be designed successfully without close collaboration between the design team and a myriad of users: to satisfy users' needs, yet allow for future change.

Design does demand specialist skills (AJ 10.4.03), but almost any competent architect can acquire these on the job by talking to users of comparable rooms, departments, routes, mechanical services, etc, and particularly learning from failures more than from successes.

It is nonsense that current procurement allows designs to be frozen before discussion with users can take place; rather like converting existing buildings.

With a few exceptions, it is the failure of clients to develop briefs from aspirations to operational policies, and to test these against explorations of options for planning, space, movement and mechanical services, and search for compromises between competing demands.

If there is no such detail to the brief, how can the end product be assessed for compliance?

The public purse appears unwilling to stretch to 'planning to minimise future regret': it will surely pay later.

Michael Pearson, London WC2

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.