By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


'Considerate' scheme is modernisation by stealth


I would like to express some disquiet over the 'Considerate Building Scheme' in London, whereby shells of older buildings are propped up and new internals built.

This is modernisation by stealth. I am not of the 'boil-ona-friend's-face' school, I just don't see the point in altering fine buildings which could be tastefully renovated. By mining out a building, you effectively kill off its root (like a tooth). It loses life. We sense the life has gone out of the structure.

It's vanity on the part of architects when they think they can improve on something that, for its day, was impressive. A very good renovation or extension is often breathtaking, and more challenging. It shows off the old and the new.

Would you want to remake Casablanca, destroy the original and then expect praise for your efforts?

Please correct me if I am wrong. Even ugly buildings should be preserved for their 'kitsch' content.

Julian McHale, Edgware, London

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters