By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




David Chipperfield Architects has been dropped from a £15 million scheme in north London, despite a Section 106 agreement which apparently guaranteed the firm's continued involvement in the project.

West London-based practice Hamiltons will now complete design work on the project after Camden Council declared itself satisfied that the commercial firm could match Chipperfield for design quality.

Speaking to the AJ, David Chipperfield said: 'I was in Valencia when I found out we had been dumped via Camden Council's website. . . The question this raises is whether there is any merit putting an architect's name in a Section 106 - the answer is 'no'.'

Developer Dwyer received planning permission last year for the conversion and extension of the historic Athlone Estate on Hampstead Lane in 2006, which will create 22 luxury fl ats.

Chipperfield had worked on the designs up to RIBA stage D, drafting in celebrated Swiss landscape architect Gunther Vogt to deal with the historic landscape. He said: 'What annoys me is that I went to nine or 10 meetings with the council and developed a nice relationship. Now I've ended up being the black sheep and fighting them because they didn't stick up for me.'

The committee that originally awarded planning permission to the Chipperfield scheme praised the developer and architect for an 'exemplary' design process. But, fearing he might be replaced, Chipperfield wrote to Camden Council last October seeking clarification, receiving no reply. Then early this year, Chipperfield was informed that Dwyer was considering replacing him.

Dwyer's solicitor, David Cooper, wrote to Camden Council to request that the Section 106 agreement be altered. The council agreed on the basis of assurances from the client about the new architect's brief, and because Hamiltons had three former Chipperfield employees working on the project. But, according to Chipperfield, Camden did not verify this with him.

Hamiltons director David Lawrence denies his firm has done anything wrong: 'We were approached by Dwyer back in the autumn and were asked to carry the scheme through from stage E to L.

'We agreed and waited until everything with Chipperfield had been concluded and the Section 106 agreements were altered. Once we'd been appointed, the 106 clause had been changed.'

A spokesperson for Camden Council said: 'We considered it desirable at the time to have an extra measure of control over the quality of the design by retaining the named architect [then David Chipperfield].

'We received a request from Athlone Estate to change to Hamiltons. The council agreed to the request in May 2007 because replacing the original named architect with the new one was unlikely to result in a failure to achieve the desired quality of design.'

Dwyer declined to comment except to state that it is 'more than happy with the architects it now has in place'.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters