Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Chairman's report

  • Comment

This year's submissions were of a very high standard. This, I suspect, reflects not only the improving quality of architecture generally in this country, but also the prestige of these awards.

The judging was intense but good humoured and our reward was to enjoy the commitment to quality by so many designers. There were several entries that in previous years may well have been outright winners. However, such was the standard this year that, regrettably, not all could receive the recognition that they perhaps deserved.

Several projects were highly deserving and these have been reflected in the awards given.

The judges felt that there should be an award for refurbishment. Many of the projects showed how aluminium as cladding and as extrusion offers a very appropriate contemporary material to help ensure the extended life of buildings. This presents an alternative sustainable architecture to some of the contemporary interpretations of it.

The joint winners reflect the extraordinary potential of aluminium while the projects themselves could not be more different. One uses extruded aluminium as a key structural component; the other is a tour de force that demonstrates how both scope and technique can be applied to aluminium in the pursuit of art and architecture.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.