By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.




Most readers would agree with last week's Editorial (AJ 01.02.07) that a distinction should be drawn between providing free or cut-price services and contributing in one way or another for the profession's greater good. I served on the RIBA Council for 15 years - including a term as a vice president and five terms as Honorary Secretary. I served on the ARCUK Council and a large number of other committees and competition panels, and spent several years as a trustee of the British Architectural Library Trust - all out of altruism for the advancement of architecture and the wellbeing of the profession. I have done my time before the mast but still side with Craig Douglas (AJ letters 01.02.07) on the issue of CABE's Design Review Panel.

Interestingly, four of the current panel members include among their professional affixes the letters 'ARB', despite the ARB website emphasising that it should not be used in this way.

Oblivious to the fact that 'ARB' is neither a qualification nor an honour, and refusing to accept that harm is being done to its credibility, CABE states: 'It is CABE's policy to allow panel members to list their qualifications and honours as they wish.'

CABE is not only wrong to expect design advice for free but it is also wrong not to care how its panel members present themselves to the profession and the public.

Maurice McCarthy, Chorleywood, Hertfordshire

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters