Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

...BUT THE SHORTCOMINGS OF TITLE SHOULD BE NOTED

  • Comment
LETTERS

Christopher Shaw (AJ letters 16.11.06) claims that the registration of architects achieves nothing. Registration allows clients to differentiate between qualified professionals and those who do not have the correct training, experience, ethics and obligation to abide by a code of conduct.

The responsibility for an error or omission lies with the perpetrator. We do not blame the police or courts for the actions of criminals or expect them to compensate us for anything other than criminal injuries. However, unlike the police or courts, our profession can eliminate repeat offences and prevent persons from practising as architects when their conduct falls below the required standard. As imperfect as this may be, the vast majority of clients are assured of high standards when employing an architect, in itself a worthwhile objective.

If anything, this case illustrates the danger of allowing the public to expect too much from our register. It is clear the 'consumer' does not consider themselves to be 'protected'. The ARB slogan overstates its powers. If it is misleading, it should be dropped.

Mark Benzie, by email

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.