Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

...BUT IS BEING USED AS A CREATIVE EXAMPLE

  • Comment
LETTERS

Jeffery Smith (AJ letters 08.02.07) makes the common mistake of criticising the Prince's Foundation - always an easy target - for supporting tradition as if tradition was just copying the past. Even the most elementary understanding of tradition shows that it is a creative continuity with the past, not a slavish imitation of it.

Tradition is an empirical record of what was worth keeping. In the case of sustainability, traditional design retains the memory of an architecture that evolved when energy was scarce.

Mr Smith would do better to look to traditional design for lessons in sustainability than at an architecture that set out to cast aside the lessons of history in an era of cheap energy. The likelihood is that the drive for sustainable dwellings will lead us precisely to houses with massive wall construction, punctured with tall windows and made of locally sourced materials - sounds traditional to me.

Robert Adam, Robert Adam Architects

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.