By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Bridge work

astragal

Marks Barfield doesn't do things by halves - at least not where the Thames is concerned. Having invented the London Eye (the real millennium project, delivered without the benefit of Lottery money), the practice looked a natural choice to work on the new proposed bridge between Thamesmead and Beckton Gas Works, unveiled last week. The scale of this bridge is staggering:

although the section across the Thames is about 500m, the total length is nearly 2km because of the need to get to a height of 50m to allow ships through. The line of the bridge is more or less the same as that of the ill-fated proposals by Santiago Calatrava a decade ago, which failed as a result of political incompetence and Treasury parsimony too painful to recall here. This time round, Transport for London is taking no chances, hence the fast-track process to appoint an engineer from its framework agreement list, Halcrow, to bring options forward with a an architect on the team. There is every possibility that, having established a physical and cost framework, the job will go to PFI competition, with other architects having a crack at the design. Will Marks Barfield supervise the process? Could it with Halcrow compete for the job? Wait and see.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters