Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

ARSENAL CRITIQUE WAS A WASTED OPPORTUNITY

  • Comment
LETTERS

Austin Williams' review of the new Arsenal stadium (14.07.05) tells only half the story, apparently the half supplied by the Arsenal press office. Far from there being 'only two houses compulsorily purchased', there were enough compulsory purchase orders to necessitate a major public inquiry. The independent inspector found unequivocally that there was not sufficient justification for the orders and recommended that they be withdrawn.

His ruling was hastily overturned by the ODPM. One of the most controversial aspects of the Arsenal development was the moving of a huge waste-transfer station into the heart of the residential area, bringing with it stigma and smells (the latter now officially acknowledged by council officers). In a cynical piece of social engineering, Arsenal and its architects are seeking to hide this shameful station by wrapping it in housing for key workers.

Surely the image of nurses and teachers with their backs, quite literally, up against a wall of waste is a more compelling example of the intersection of people, politics and place than William's niceties about sightlines for season ticket seats?

Professor Jeremy Till, director of architecture, University of Sheffield

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.