ARB DEBATE GETS BACK TO BASICS
Maurice McCarthy (Letters, AJ 26.04.07) again fails to follow the argument or to research matters prior to his correspondence.
If McCarthy would refer back to my original letter (AJ 01.03.07) he would see that my point was simply that ARB would have no right to tell the CABE panel member architects how to announce their registration, as long as they do not misrepresent their status. It seems that McCarthy is under the impression that if a statutory body is not expressly empowered to authorise something, it follows that it is given the lawful right to prevent it, even though it is not expressly empowered to enforce that prevention. Clearly this is nonsense.
McCarthy goes on to claim that a registered architect using the ARB affix to signify a professional qualification or membership is acting fraudulently. In trying to wriggle out of his errors, he is digging an even deeper hole for himself by implying that the CABE panel members were committing fraud - after all, what else were they doing by using the affix other than signifying that they were qualified to be registered?
Peter Arnold, Colorado, USA