By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


...and how did architect get around the regs?


The Boyarsky Murphy house in Hammersmith is truly elegant and worthy of the coverage you give it (AJ 28.2.02).

But (yawn, yawn) what about the Building Regulations? It seems that every other month the AJ holds up as excellent a residential project that pretty well flaunts what any local authority would require for passing. Is this not a three-storey dwelling (did they really buy the live/work line), and therefore in need of a protected escape for the top bedroom? And what about that handrail without protection and open-tread stair?

If the architects have successfully negotiated around the most fundamental principles of the Approved Documents, then they should write an article to help the rest of us do the same.

If they completed the project without a building control submission or did the old trick of removing doors and walls after the project was signed off, then the AJ is just printing more eyecandy and shouldn't be taken seriously as a professional journal.

John Onken,3s Architects Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters