By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Does Passivhaus constrain design?

[UKPHC Part 2] This was the great debate question raised at last week’s Passivhaus Conference, here architects and Passivhaus enthusiasts give their view.

Nick Grant, Elemental Solutions:

‘Yes. Passivhaus standards are a constraint, but nature has incredible constraints and we do not say nature is dull or boring. Intuitive design doesn’t get us to Passivhaus standards.

‘To a trained eye a Passivhaus building will always look like a Passivhaus but if you are serious about sustainability then you have to design to constraints.’

Richard Hawkes, Hawkes Architecture:

‘Passivhaus is a tool and it can become intuitive the more you use it. But I don’t design using PHPP.’

John LeFever, Hastoe Housing:

Customers of housing developers want brick and stone, surely that is more of a constraint to design than Passivhaus principles.’

Fran Bradshaw, Anne Thorne Architects:

‘Passivhaus is just another tool in the book. It can do both design and energy efficiency. It is a bad idea to look at it as a constraint.

Some buildings will just not work for a sustainable planet

‘Some buildings will just not work for a sustainable planet. For example, I love Zaha’s work but I would love to challenge her to design in that way but to Passivhaus standards – is it achievable?’

Sarah Lewis, bere: architects:

‘Passivhaus opens up the possibilities of design rather than closes them down. It allows us to use PHPP to design better, more energy efficient buildings.’

Jonathan Hines, Architype:

‘Passivhaus is just the logical next step on the journey to creating a rigorous design discipline for sustainable architecture. It frees up the architect to create sustainable well designed buildings’.

Should RIBA have an annual sustainability award?

Vote in the AJ poll

Subscribe to Footprint by email and follow Hattie Hartman on twitter.

Readers' comments (2)

  • Interestingly lack of constraints should lead to better design (ignoring function which is a huge constraint) but the opposite seems to be true.

    As someone said, if you want to double creativity, halve the budget. That should make me popular here!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • We shall start by emphasising that PH Standard does not constrain the amount of energy not used and certainly none of the levels of health, wellbeing and comfort - and then we can think of "making it nicer".

    In general the times when humans’ egocentric and random understanding of freedom was declaring this a preferred tradition and that the mainstream’s design will have to become history pretty fast. Freedom will have to be ruled as anything else by what sustainability allows as we will be able to host +7 billion people and more, only, if we arrange ourselves with what is a finite planet! PH Standard will be(come) one part of this arrangement and as such it is much more than just another regulation.


    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters