By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Mark Cannata on the buildings as architects’ pin-up

As a synthesis between history and utopia, the red buildings became a paradigm of the fusion between past and future, somewhere between Paxton and Skylab.

They became the symbol of the tension between research into the future and continuity in architecture. In becoming so, James Stirling’s engrossing buildings became the architecture students’ favourite pin-up buildings– a seductive object, both distinct and indistinct, whose questioning effect was its meaning, buildings whose obvious signifiers did not signify the nature of their presence: the future as a known unknown.

The History Faculty building’s power to represent an aspirational future remains undiminished by its shortcomings. We forgive its weaknesses, just as we do with a classic racing car or an ageing rocker. James Stirling was a master of the alchemical art of weaving history and technology and created a new vision that, like the Saturn V or Keith Richards’ white fender, became a symbol of an era. These are building that, despite their troubled life and reputation had and still have the architectural equivalent of extreme street cred.

All text is extracted from Jim Stirling and the Red Trilogy – Three Radical Buildings,  Frances Lincoln, October 2010, £30

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters