By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Conscientious objector

Brighton and Hove Council’s decision to give the go-ahead to Frank Gehry’s King Alfred scheme seems a little less surprising when you consider the quality of some of the objections raised at Friday’s council meeting. Valerie Paynter of Save Hove, one of the project’ most vociferous opponents, presented two buildings by FAT to prove that ‘Frank Gehry is not cutting edge any more. This is cutting edge’. She then went on explain how the original King Alfred building was built at almost exactly the same time as Tate Modern and therefore could be regenerated to the same effect. Not by the same architect, granted. But hey, it’s either a vintage year or it’s not. There was also concern that Gehry would not be able to deliver the Kalzip roof in the colour represented in the planning documents. Gehry Partners’ response? ‘Somebody always says we can’t build our buildings. And you know what? We always do.’

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters