By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Daniel Libeskind's book signing of 'Counterpoint'

At a signing of his new book, ‘Counterpoint,’ at New York’s Strand Bookstore, architect Daniel Libeskind got philosophical.

‘I always think, intuitively, viscerally, that a building must have a point,’ he said.   

Of course, Libeskind’s idea of the ‘point’ of his commissions doesn’t always jive with everyone else’s.  He readily acknowledged the heavy fire he’s come under for some of the projects described in the book, such as the Jewish Museum in Berlin and the Denver Art Museum.  Later in the evening, Libeskind offered some insight into what might be the crux of his disagreement with his critics: ‘[Architecture] is not a language you can put in words,’ he said.  ‘If you could, you wouldn’t need to build a building.’ 

No need to build buildings except to express something ineffable?  What about to give people places to live, work, and play?  It was a revealing comment – and didn‘t exactly help refute criticisms that Libeskind sacrifices function at the altar of form.

But refuting criticism doesn’t seem to be on Libeskind’s agenda.  ‘My responsibility is not to be the glowing darling of the press,’ he said.  ‘I don’t care about that.’  If anything, rather, Libeskind takes pride in the criticism he attracts.  His reaction, for instance, to complaints that his museum designs induce vertigo?  ‘I say, great!’ he retorted.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related images

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters