By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Architect needed for Cambridge primary school

[Request to participate to be returned by 17 December] Cambridgeshire County Council is on the lookout for an architect for a new primary school

Part of the council’s North West Cambridge Development (pictured), the 400-student school will be on a 3 hectare site and is planned to open in September 2015.

Full architectural and landscaping design services from RIBA stage A to L are called for with works to begin March 2013.

Full occupation is planned to commence in September 2018

Readers' comments (1)

  • It is interesting that you flag this tender opportunity as at first sight it does look like something just 'up our street', having been doing similar work for over a decade. However, this procurement process seems to contain many of the smaller firm excluding aspects that the RIBA has been campaigning against. We obtained a PQQ (a time consuming process of registration and downloading in itself) only to find that a firm like ours is excluded at the first hurdle. I list two key issues here that operate against the inclusion of smaller (but capable) firms:-
    1. Fee value cited as £250k per year and this must not be more than 40% of the firm's turnover. This means that the minimum turnover needs to be £625k by my calculations and therefore excuding firms with a perfectly reasonable turnover of say, £500k. Also, using a generous £1,800 per sq m on a 420 place school (2FE) the construction cost would be a little over £4M. Even if we said £5M, is the client really offering to pay £250,000 per year in fees. That is 5% of the construction value x 3(?) years say. We would consider ourselves fortunate indeed to get 5% for the entire job nowadays.
    2. PQQ level set at £10M. Even at £5 million construction value, what is the real risk of an architect's negligent act resulting in a cost of £10M?
    These are just two of the criteria that will exclude/dissuade smaller firms from competing for this work and I believe this to be to the detriment of smaller architectural practices and potentially the client.
    The RIBA has recently published a report on public sector procurement and we need to get this message out to public bodies procuring profesional services.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters