By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Comment - Irresponsible architects

In Denmark architects have far more responsibility, says Teva Hesse, and this leads to better design

Has architecture in the UK become too fragmented, and the design process over specialised? Are architects in danger of becoming managers of other consultants’ input into their projects? From the perspective of 15 years of practice in Denmark and my work in London over the past six years, my answer is an unequivocal yes on both counts.

The design and construction industry in a small country like Denmark does not have the scale or economy to support the UK’s degree of professional specialisation. But this has not impacted the quality of buildings produced there. Danish buildings often achieve an architectural clarity which is enhanced by a more straightforward design process.

Architectural project teams in Denmark regularly fulfil the role of project manager, QS, townscape advisor, planning supervisor, accessibility consultant and planning consultant. This already halves the size of the design team, but several Danish practices go even further and integrate urban design, masterplanning, landscape architecture, construction management, space planning/fitout, industrial design and lighting design into their work.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters