By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Ashley Freeman

Ashley Freeman

Recent activity

Comments (2)

  • Comment on: Owen Hatherley’s Eurovisionaries: Split

    Ashley Freeman's comment 15-Aug-2015 4:11 pm

    Not a very accurate map. The Ukraine and Moldova are not a Part of the EU!

  • Comment on: School heads welcome call to scrap the Parts 1-3 system

    Ashley Freeman's comment 19-Apr-2013 1:52 pm

    Every year graduates struggle to find Part1 placements. It will be interesting to see how any new proposals will accommodate work experience. I initially trained as a technician, and am now studying to become an Architect, andI think that it would be unwise to allow different specialisms to practice under the title of Architect. I agree with the above comment - the current 7 year process gives Architects an unrivalled broad knowledge of construction and design. The title 'Architect' is protected (in theory). If the RIBA/ARB promoted the profession (even at the smaller scale) then maybe there would be more opportunities for students to gain 'real world' experience. Personally I feel that abandoning the EU directive can only be a positive move. The current situation puts British students at a disadvantage to their continental counterparts both financially and in terms of time in education. While studying for 7 years is compulsory here, in the EU 5 years training is the norm. Yet the EU directive gives allows students from the EU to come to Britain and practice as an Architect. I would argue that the RIBA should be independent from EU laws - Surely they can have a great influence on education standards without EU directives etc.